Blogs and briefs-June
The number of minority-owned employer businesses increased by over 334,000 from 2017 to 2022, adding $738 billion to the economy and creating 1.9 million more jobs in 2022 compared to 2017, @andreperryedu notes. https://www.brookings.edu/?p=1807280&post_type=article&preview=1&_ppp=e2473bf243
Despite recent growth in Black-owned businesses, the share of employer businesses Black people own is 3.3%—substantially lower than Black Americans’ 14.4% share of the population, @andreperryedu, Hannah Stephens & @ManannanAD write. https://www.brookings.edu/?p=1807280&post_type=article&preview=1&_ppp=e2473bf243
Strong business growth rates across race and ethnicity show that minority business owners’ success does not come at the expense of white business owners, @andreperryedu, Hannah Stephens & @ManannanAD say in new analysis. https://www.brookings.edu/?p=1807280&post_type=article&preview=1&_ppp=e2473bf243
Since 2017, Black-female-owned businesses increased by 71.6%, but out of the roughly 70,000 new Black-owned employer businesses created from 2017 to 2022, fewer than half were female-owned, @andreperryedu says. https://www.brookings.edu/?p=1807280&post_type=article&preview=1&_ppp=e2473bf243
Continuing to support Black-owned businesses isn’t just about creating a more inclusive economy that works for more Americans—it’s about strengthening the economy for all Americans, argue @andreperryedu, Hannah Stephens & @ManannanAD. https://www.brookings.edu/?p=1807280&post_type=article&preview=1&_ppp=e2473bf243
How successful are Black-owned businesses in your metro? Check out this new interactive: https://www.brookings.edu/?p=1807280&post_type=article&preview=1&_ppp=e2473bf243#map-1
Where will generative AI technology most help or harm workers in the U.S.? @MarkMuro1, Shriya Methkupally & @MollyKinder answer this question here: https://www.brookings.edu/articles/the-geography-of-generative-ais-workforce-impacts-will-likely-differ-from-those-of-previous-technologies/
Generative AI is not your grandparents’—or even your parents’—automation, @MarkMuro1 & @MollyKinder say. The geography patterns of generative AI will look quite different from those of previous forms of automation. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/the-geography-of-generative-ais-workforce-impacts-will-likely-differ-from-those-of-previous-technologies/
Workers in high-skill metro areas such as San Jose, Calif. appear likely to experience heavy involvement with generative AI, while those in less office-oriented metro areas such as Las Vegas appear far less susceptible, @MarkMuro1 says. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/the-geography-of-generative-ais-workforce-impacts-will-likely-differ-from-those-of-previous-technologies/
The geography of AI exposure looks like it will be exactly opposite of what it was for previous automation bouts, ensuring it will present new and different riddles, argue @MarkMuro1, Shriya Methkupally & @MollyKinder. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/the-geography-of-generative-ais-workforce-impacts-will-likely-differ-from-those-of-previous-technologies/
As the generative AI race heats up, it’s important to examine where in the U.S. the technology might boost or harm workers. To do so, @The Brookings Institution researchers recently used data on different occupation’s share of local employment to calculate county- and metro-level exposure statistics. Such statistics reflect the share of AI-exposed jobs relative to all local jobs in the geographic area.
Most notably, @Mark Muro, @Shriya Methkupally, and @Molly Kinder found that possible geographic impact patterns of generative AI look quite different from those of previous forms of automation. Highly educated, high-paying, white-collar metro areas previously considered to be at relatively low risk of automation look to be the places that will be the most exposed to generative AI—meaning that they will both gain the most from the potential it unlocks as well as shoulder the greatest burdens of any worker displacement and disruption it causes.
In this respect, the urban geography of generative AI starkly contrasts with the geography of previous automation technologies such as digital enterprise systems and robotics. As those technologies spread over the past decade, they tended to impact workers in lower-paid, less educated metro areas much more than those in higher-tech, office-oriented metro areas (who tended to benefit from them).
Now, the higher-end workers and regions only mildly exposed to earlier forms of automation look to be most involved (for better or worse) with generative AI and its facility for cognitive, office-type tasks. In that vein, workers in high-skill metro areas such as San Jose, Calif.; San Francisco; Durham, N.C.; New York; and Washington D.C. appear likely to experience heavy involvement with generative AI, while those in less office-oriented metro areas such as Las Vegas; Toledo, Ohio; and Fort Wayne, Ind. appear far less susceptible.
Read more: https://www.brookings.edu/articles/the-geography-of-generative-ais-workforce-impacts-will-likely-differ-from-those-of-previous-technologies/
Since 2010, colleges nationwide have lost nearly 1/5th of their students and Native American students have been some of the most impacted, with a decline of 37% since 2010—over twice the national average, @robmaxim writes. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/federal-data-vastly-undercount-native-american-college-students-new-federal-standards-could-change-that/ @IHEPTweets
The challenge of measuring Native American students’ educational access and success is made even more difficult by the poor quality of higher education data, Bryan Cook, Kimberly Dancy, @robmaxim, @NaraNayar & Janiel Santos write. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/federal-data-vastly-undercount-native-american-college-students-new-federal-standards-could-change-that/ @IHEPTweets
In a new report, @robmaxim, @NaraNayar, and Kimberly Dancy & Janiel Santos say that it's now critical that the @usedgov, a federal agency created by Congress, follow through on their directive to enhance Native American student data collection & reporting. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/federal-data-vastly-undercount-native-american-college-students-new-federal-standards-could-change-that/
Native American students have long needed to contend with the twin challenges of underrepresentation and misunderstanding in higher education and poor data exacerbates both of those challenges, @robmaxim writes. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/federal-data-vastly-undercount-native-american-college-students-new-federal-standards-could-change-that/
.@Linda_McMahon, if confirmed, must allow revised federal standards for measuring race and ethnicity to stay in effect, argues @robmaxim. These revised standards would improve the inclusivity and accuracy of data on Native American students in higher ed. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/federal-data-vastly-undercount-native-american-college-students-new-federal-standards-could-change-that/
Amid @Linda_McMahon’s pending confirmation as the Secretary of the U.S. Department of Education, @robmaxim says it’s critical that the @usedgov follow through on their directive to enhance Native American student data collection and reporting. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/federal-data-vastly-undercount-native-american-college-students-new-federal-standards-could-change-that/
Since 2010, colleges nationwide have lost nearly one-fifth of their students but while these national numbers are significant, they mask that some students have been substantially more affected than others. Native American students are among those most affected by the college enrollment decline. These students have seen an enrollment decline of 37% since 2010—more than twice the national average.
These numbers suggest a crisis for Native American students in higher education. Unfortunately, the challenge of measuring Native American students’ educational access and success is made even more difficult by the poor quality of higher education data. Fortunately, in 2024, the federal government published revised federal standards for measuring race and ethnicity that would improve the inclusivity and accuracy of data on Native American students.
Now, the authors say it is critical that the Trump administration, and @ Linda_McMahon, if confirmed as the Secretary of the U.S. Department of Education (ED), allow the revised SPD 15 standards to remain in effect, and for officials at the Education Department and elsewhere throughout government to implement the standards in a way that provides Native American students and communities with the same high-quality data that all Americans should be able to access.
In their new report, @ Urban Institute’s @ Bryan Cook, Institute for Higher Education Policy’s @ Kimberly Dancy and @ Janiel Santos, @ Brookings’ @ Robert Maxim, and @ American Institutes for Research @ Nara Nayar say that moving forward, the U.S. Department of Education and Congress can take several steps to improve data quality about Native American students and graduates, as well as better respect tribal data sovereignty, including:
Collecting and publishing disaggregated data on all Native American students
Partnering with tribal governments to increase data transparency
Providing guidance and resources to institutions to improve the quality of data about Native American students
Read more: https://www.brookings.edu/articles/federal-data-vastly-undercount-native-american-college-students-new-federal-standards-could-change-that/
The U.S.-China clash will play out globally and strategically, but its potential impacts will be localized and varied across the country, since different U.S. regions have different local industry mixes and structures, @robmaxim & @MarkMuro1 say. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/chinas-retaliatory-tariffs-will-hurt-trump-voting-counties-most/
The U.S. industries that stand to be affected by China’s proposed retaliatory tariffs—encompassing a total of 80 different manufactured and energy products that the U.S. exports to China—account for between 400,000 and 700,000 jobs. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/chinas-retaliatory-tariffs-will-hurt-trump-voting-counties-most/
Similar to the 2018 tariffs, the industrial heartland is again bearing a disproportionate impact from Chinese retaliation, @robmaxim, @MarkMuro1 & Shriya Methkupally find in a new analysis. Read more: https://www.brookings.edu/articles/chinas-retaliatory-tariffs-will-hurt-trump-voting-counties-most/
Energy and manufacturing communities in North Dakota, Indiana, Ohio, Kentucky, Alabama, and West Virginia will be some of the most intensely affected counties by China’s proposed retaliatory tariffs, @robmaxim, @MarkMuro1 & Shriya Methkupally note. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/chinas-retaliatory-tariffs-will-hurt-trump-voting-counties-most/
Sargent County, N.D. has the highest potential exposure to Chinese tariffs of any county in the U.S. due to its large manufacturing presence, with 59% of its employment in industries potentially affected. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/chinas-retaliatory-tariffs-will-hurt-trump-voting-counties-most/
Nearly 2/3 of all jobs in industries affected by the proposed Chinese tariffs reside in Trump-voting counties. Of the 2,010 counties with employment in these industries, 1,722 of them voted for Trump compared to just 288 for Harris. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/chinas-retaliatory-tariffs-will-hurt-trump-voting-counties-most/
Tariffs have real effects on employment in places across the nation, and a continued expansion of protectionism and retaliation is likely to cause substantially more disruption for more American workers, argue @robmaxim, @MarkMuro1 & Shriya Methkupally. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/chinas-retaliatory-tariffs-will-hurt-trump-voting-counties-most/
With Trump standing by his threat to impose 10% tariffs on imports from China, and China sticking with its threat of counter-tariffs commencing on Monday, the nation may well be heading toward a new reminder of the unfortunate ways local communities can suffer collateral damage from international faceoffs. While the China clash will play out globally and strategically, its potential impacts in the U.S. will be localized and varied, since different regions have different local industry mixes and structures.
In a new analysis, @ Brookings’ @ Rob Maxim, @ Mark Muro, and @ Shriya Methkupally look at the local geography of the pending trade war as an example of how national tariff policies can hurt communities and their economies. The authors find that the affected industries account for between 400,000 and 700,000 jobs in the United States, with the industrial heartland bearing a disproportionate impact from China’s retaliation.
The proposed Chinese tariffs would also disproportionately impact areas where the majority of people voted for Trump. Nearly two-thirds of all jobs in industries affected by the tariffs reside in Trump-voting counties. Of the 2,010 counties with employment in these industries, 1,722 of them voted for Trump compared to just 288 for Harris.
Overall, the authors say that tariffs—both those implemented by the U.S. as well as foreign retaliation—have real effects on employment in places across the nation, and a continued expansion of protectionism and retaliation is likely to cause substantially more disruption for more American workers.
Read more: https://www.brookings.edu/articles/chinas-retaliatory-tariffs-will-hurt-trump-voting-counties-most/
The U.S. Congress under @JoeBiden committed to delivering a cleaner national transportation network, but with a Republican trifecta and a new presidential executive order, those climate commitments could now be under threat & short-lived, @AdieTomer says. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/climate-accountable-planning/
How can states respond if federal funding for clean and resilient transportation is discontinued? @AdieTomer & Benjamin Swedberg tackle this question--> https://www.brookings.edu/articles/climate-accountable-planning/
Beyond continuing to plan and invest on their own, states would be wise to create a rainy-day capital account that could insure against any reductions in federal fiscal support, @AdieTomer & Benjamin Swedberg write
In a statewide analysis, @AdieTomer & Benjamin Swedberg find that 19 states have no climate resilient transportation plans. Many Southeast and Great Plains states did not create them, such as Georgia, Alabama, Mississippi, and Texas. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/climate-accountable-planning/
If governors and legislators truly want to protect the economic and physical security of their constituents, adopting more climate-focused transportation planning is an obvious place to start, @AdieTomer & Benjamin Swedberg say. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/climate-accountable-planning/
Beginning in 2021, the U.S. Congress adopted a more holistic and well-funded commitment to delivering a cleaner and more resilient national transportation network. Central to that congressional commitment was a direct investment in the capacity of U.S. states to conduct climate-focused transportation planning and construct related projects.
But now with a Republican trifecta in power in the federal government, those climate commitments could be under threat and short-lived. Such political shifts raise the need to understand how much new federal programs induced more state planning—and how states may respond if federal funding is discontinued.
To answer both questions, @ Adie Tomer and @ Ben Swedberg inventoried every state’s climate-focused transportation planning practices. The results of their research are both promising and concerning. Aided by direct federal funding support, more states are now producing emissions mitigation and climate resilience plans. Yet the historic record also suggests roughly half of these states may revert to less climate-focused planning if federal support recedes—and the record is especially worrisome in the Southeastern and Great Plains states.
Based on these findings, the authors recommend that Congress continue to support climate-focused transportation programming but also say that states should not rely solely on this federal support. Beyond continuing to plan and invest on their own, states would be wise to create a rainy-day capital account that could insure against any reductions in federal fiscal support, Tomer and Swedberg write.
Read more: https://www.brookings.edu/articles/climate-accountable-planning/
“Apprenticeships are just a larger reflection of our kids, which is a larger reflection of our future,” Sen. @Hickenlooper said at a @BrookingsInst event where he stressed that youth apprenticeships represent a rare opportunity for bipartisan cooperation. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/apprenticeships-can-supercharge-career-opportunities-for-youth/
Providing earlier opportunities for hands-on learning across a wide range of careers in the U.S. can reach disengaged students and also help high schoolers make more informed choices about higher education—and even finance it, Annelies Goger says. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/apprenticeships-can-supercharge-career-opportunities-for-youth/
The transformative potential of apprenticeships in getting more talent “on the field” represents both an economic imperative and a moral obligation, Annelies Goger, @NoelForColorado, @LateefahDurant & Frankie Mansaray write. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/apprenticeships-can-supercharge-career-opportunities-for-youth/
As baby boomers retire and overall U.S. labor force participation declines, employers across the country are increasingly struggling to fill open positions and retain qualified employees. Although often framed as a "skills gap," @ Annelies Goger has argued that this scarcity lies not with deficits in the individual but with the lack of opportunities to get into good jobs. Put another way, the U.S. has plenty of talent but struggles to activate it.
In a new publication, Goger, @ Noel Ginsburg, @ Lateefah Durant, and @ Frankie Mansaray emphasize the importance of youth apprenticeships in addressing this issue and point out that they represent a rare opportunity for bipartisan cooperation.
The authors also highlight a recent @ Brookings Institution event, where Sen. John Hickenlooper (D-CO) confirmed that both Republicans and Democrats support ensuring that we have a workforce to continue to lead the world in innovation and new ideas.
The transformative potential of apprenticeships in getting more talent “on the field” represents both an economic imperative and a moral obligation, Goger, Ginsburg, Durant, and Mansaray write.
Read more: https://www.brookings.edu/articles/apprenticeships-can-supercharge-career-opportunities-for-youth/
Former President @JoeBiden’s very last executive order on economic policy provides a strong bipartisan foundation on which the Trump administration can build, @MarkMuro1 & @anthonypipa write. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/in-one-of-his-final-actions-biden-urges-continued-help-for-left-behind-places/
Will @JoeBiden’s last executive order on economic policy actually influence the Trump administration? @MarkMuro1 & @anthonypipa say the genie of helping left-behind places with focused, coherent, place-based economic policies is out of the bag. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/in-one-of-his-final-actions-biden-urges-continued-help-for-left-behind-places/
Both Republicans and Democrats have taken an interest in helping left-behind places, both rural and urban. This raises the hope that these areas will get the time & support they need to enable local economic transformations, @MarkMuro1 & @anthonypipa say. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/in-one-of-his-final-actions-biden-urges-continued-help-for-left-behind-places/
President Donald Trump signed an avalanche of executive orders on his first day in office, consuming policymakers’ and the media’s attention. Meanwhile, former President Joe Biden’s very last executive order on economic policy—issued on January 19, the last full day of his tenure—has gone relatively unnoticed.
But @ Mark Muro and @ Tony Pipa say that Biden’s order—on “helping left-behind communities make a comeback"—merits attention. Not only does it memorialize an important part of the Biden-Harris economic agenda, but given continued bipartisan concern for “left-behind places,” the action also extends important ideas about place into the next administration and beyond. As such, Biden’s order provides a strong foundation on which the Trump administration can build.
Read more: https://www.brookings.edu/articles/in-one-of-his-final-actions-biden-urges-continued-help-for-left-behind-places/
The Trump administration is likely to begin implementing policies such as mass deportations, but William H. Frey asks: Will these actions recognize key demographic shifts occurring across the nation, or will they cater mostly to his MAGA base? https://www.brookings.edu/articles/will-trumps-inaugural-address-recognize-americas-key-demographic-shifts/
While anti-immigration actions might be popular with Trump’s still heavily white and older voter bloc, they disregard that recent demographic shifts mean that increased immigration is crucial for the nation’s future economic vibrancy, William H. Frey says. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/will-trumps-inaugural-address-recognize-americas-key-demographic-shifts/
As many Americans focus on President-elect Donald Trump’s inauguration, his Day 1 pronouncements, and the policies he plans to introduce, one question is: Will these actions recognize key demographic shifts occurring across the nation, or will they cater mostly to his MAGA base?
In light of President-elect Trump’s sensational campaign rhetoric, his administration is likely to begin implementing policies such as mass deportations and abolishment of diversity initiatives. While such actions might be popular with his still heavily white and older voter bloc, they disregard fundamental shifts in the nation’s demographic structure that both increased immigration and elevated attention to diversity and are crucial for the nation’s future economic vibrancy.
This is neither the time to make bad choices on federal immigration actions, nor the time to put the brakes on programs that address racial disparities among America’s youth—the future of our labor force, argues @Brookings’ William H. Frey. Let’s hope the President-elect Trump’s inaugural address and early actions pay attention to policies that can address these demographic needs that are critical for the nation’s future prosperity.
Read more: https://www.brookings.edu/articles/will-trumps-inaugural-address-recognize-americas-key-demographic-shifts/
In a new @sdutOpinion piece, @EmilyWier & @AdieTomer say that as inauguration day draws nearer, San Diego needs an offensive game plan to meet the moment and deliver regional value, such as federal infrastructure funding. Read more:
In a new The San Diego Union-Tribune op-ed, Emily Wier and Adie Tomer say that while San Diego residents, businesses, community organizations, government agencies, and elected officials are all waiting on pins and needles to figure out exactly what the Trump administration means for the region, there’s no reason for San Diego to only strike a defensive and reactive posture when it comes to federal Washington.
The authors write that there will certainly be impacts and challenges for the region, but as inauguration day draws nearer, San Diego needs an offensive game plan to meet the moment and deliver regional value. For example, the Trump administration will have approximately $294 billion left to distribute from the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, according to the Brookings Federal Infrastructure Hub tracker.
San Diego can remain competitive in securing these funds if it prioritizes areas where common ground already exists; identifies projects with regional importance; engages its civic sector; and aligns its strategy and approach with what we’re hearing are the priorities in the new Washington.
Read more: https://lnkd.in/eW8bZ4V3
The visible destruction to homes, businesses, and livelihoods from the L.A. fires has garnered significant attention but the fires are also a reminder of the struggles to recognize and reinvest in the country’s water infrastructure, @jwkane1 says. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/the-los-angeles-fires-and-americas-overwhelmed-water-infrastructure/
The ultimate reality facing Los Angeles and the @LADWP—similar to many other communities and water utilities nationally—is one of underrecognized and underinvested infrastructure, argues @jwkane1. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/the-los-angeles-fires-and-americas-overwhelmed-water-infrastructure/
Repeated disasters—from the Los Angeles fires to past tragedies such as Hurricane Katrina—serve as continued reminders of the need for proactive water infrastructure planning and investment, @jwkane1 writes. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/the-los-angeles-fires-and-americas-overwhelmed-water-infrastructure/
The Los Angeles fires are already one of the most devastating disasters in California—and national—history. Fanned by high winds and fed by a prolonged drought, the blazes rapidly spread across thousands of acres in the nearby Santa Monica Mountains and into several neighborhoods. More than a week since the fires erupted, they have already destroyed at least 5,000 homes and countless other structures, in addition to causing numerous deaths, evacuations, and other impacts.
In addition to this visible destruction, the fires are also a reminder of the struggles to recognize and reinvest in the country’s water infrastructure. The city’s existing water infrastructure faced an impossible expectation—and task—as the historic fire spread. While Los Angeles has endured recent droughts and dry vegetation helped ignite the fire, water supply was not as much an issue as the infrastructure’s underlying design and function.
But rather than being used to cast blame at underequipped and overwhelmed utilities, disasters such as the Los Angeles fires should serve as a rallying cry to get ahead of these infrastructure challenges. Repeated disasters—from the L.A. fires to past tragedies such as Hurricane Katrina—serve as continued reminders of the need for proactive water infrastructure planning and investment, Kane writes.
Read more: https://www.brookings.edu/articles/the-los-angeles-fires-and-americas-overwhelmed-water-infrastructure/
The housing crisis is daunting and complicated by a fragmented regulatory environment, but at the local level, we see solutions driven by goodwill and ethical leadership that can be replicated across all levels, @andreperryedu writes. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/the-country-needs-to-build-homes-and-community-like-jimmy-carter/
If we commit to building homes like Jimmy Carter did, @andreperryedu says we can begin to address some of deeper issues that keep us mired in a perpetuating housing crisis, with all its harmful repercussions. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/the-country-needs-to-build-homes-and-community-like-jimmy-carter/
To truly address our social disharmony, we must commit to creating policies for those with fewer opportunities for homeownership and tackle the root causes of the problem, including systemic racism, argues @andreperryedu. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/the-country-needs-to-build-homes-and-community-like-jimmy-carter/
Part of Jimmy Carter’s legacy includes his involvement with Habitat for Humanity International, where his direct participation contributed to the construction of thousands of new homes for families. Since 1984, the Jimmy & Rosalynn Carter Work Project has touched lives around the world by inspiring more than 108,000 volunteers to help build, renovate and repair 4,447 homes in 14 countries.
Over the past 4 years, @ Andre Perry served as a keynote at numerous Habitat affiliate events. Last year, he served as the keynote speaker at the annual housing build dedicated to Jimmy and Rosalynn Carter, held in Minneapolis. At this event, Perry saw a diverse team of men and women of various races, ages, and ability levels, primarily distinguished by their sky-blue hard hats and protective goggles as they swung hammers, carried lumber, building, literally and figuratively, a sense of community.
If we commit to building homes like Carter did, we can begin to address some of deeper issues that keep us mired in a perpetuating housing crisis, with all its harmful repercussions, Perry writes.
Read more: https://www.brookings.edu/articles/the-country-needs-to-build-homes-and-community-like-jimmy-carter/
In a new report, @lohplaces & @xavbriggs offer more context on the development of racial equity impact assessment (REIA)’s and their application to land use decisions, particularly in New York City and the Washington, D.C. area. Read more: https://www.brookings.edu/articles/getting-to-equitable-development/
Racial equity impact assessment—systematic, pre-decisional equity impact assessment of any kind and scope—represents an important and demanding evolution in land use planning and development, argue @lohplaces & @xavbriggs. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/getting-to-equitable-development/
While concerns about racial and economic equity are nothing new in land use debates, recent years have sharply intensified conflicts over unaffordable housing, gentrification, and displacement pressures from new development (especially in communities of color and working-class neighborhoods), as well as the potential impacts of land use reforms such as “upzoning” or other rezoning, which are meant to encourage more real estate investment and permit bigger projects.
In this context of sharper stakes, together with the mass protests and racial reckoning triggered by the on-camera murder of George Floyd in 2020, equity advocates both inside and outside of government have called for changes in the way governments make such high-stakes decisions.
In a new report, @ Brookings Institution’s @ Tracy Hadden Loh and @ Xavier de Souza Briggs offer more context on the development of racial equity impact assessment (REIA)’s and their application to land use decisions, particularly in New York City and the Washington, D.C. area.
Read more: https://www.brookings.edu/articles/getting-to-equitable-development/
More than 20 U.S. governors have committed to eliminating degree requirements for public sector jobs. But if states do nothing more than eliminate degree requirements, the status quo is likely to continue, Annelies Goger argues. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/theres-more-to-skills-based-hiring-than-just-removing-degree-requirements
State governments are well positioned to play a broader role in building the infrastructure needed for skills-based hiring, rather than just eliminating degree requirements for public sector jobs, Annelies Goger writes. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/theres-more-to-skills-based-hiring-than-just-removing-degree-requirements
In a new piece, Annelies Goger says that as states continue to lead the way to a skills-based labor market, they face significant challenges, including information and technology barriers and cultural and awareness challenges. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/theres-more-to-skills-based-hiring-than-just-removing-degree-requirements
Success in improving skills-based hiring could lead to a more equitable, efficient, and accessible job market that better serves both employers and job seekers, Annelies Goger says. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/theres-more-to-skills-based-hiring-than-just-removing-degree-requirements
Skills-based hiring is gaining momentum as a strategy to open up hiring processes across the country. States, in particular, are taking the lead in these "skills-first" hiring practices, and much of the early focus has been on removing degree requirements. So far, more than 20 governors have committed to eliminating degree requirements for public sector jobs.
But @ Brookings Institution Fellow @ Annelies Goger says removing degree requirements is just a first step in skills-based hiring, and probably the easiest one. If states do nothing more than eliminate degree requirements, the status quo is likely to continue.
Goger also says states that are co-designing Learning and Employment Records (LER) ecosystems, which identify skills beyond degrees or certificates, are facing significant challenges. For example, the applicant tracking systems that employers use generally don’t have a way to capture digital records of learning or work experience, so they fall into a void.
Read more: https://www.brookings.edu/articles/theres-more-to-skills-based-hiring-than-just-removing-degree-requirements
In a new report, William H. Frey says it is net immigration from abroad—not a return to pre-pandemic birth and death levels—that is mostly responsible for the nation’s population growth from July 2023 to July 2024—the largest in over two decades. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/immigration-drives-the-nations-healthy-post-pandemic-population-growth-new-census-data-show/
It is unlikely that the nation’s levels of natural population increase (the excess of births over deaths) will rise substantially in the future due to aging—making immigration a key component of future U.S. demographic growth, argues William H. Frey. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/immigration-drives-the-nations-healthy-post-pandemic-population-growth-new-census-data-show/
More than four-fifths of the nation’s recent population growth is due to immigration, a result of still low levels of natural increase, William H. Frey’s analysis of @uscensusbureau data show. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/immigration-drives-the-nations-healthy-post-pandemic-population-growth-new-census-data-show/
The notable rise in the nation’s population growth impacted all regions & most states in 2023-24, William H. Frey says. The South leads, but California, New York, and New Jersey rank third, fifth, and sixth, respectively, in numeric gains. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/immigration-drives-the-nations-healthy-post-pandemic-population-growth-new-census-data-show/
Immigration contributed more to population growth than domestic migration in the South and several large states, William H. Frey says. For example, Florida and Texas have been gaining population primarily from immigration in the past two years. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/immigration-drives-the-nations-healthy-post-pandemic-population-growth-new-census-data-show/
While immigration is often associated with big states, new @uscensusbureau data show that immigration can be the primary and, in many cases, only component of demographic change in states of all sizes and in all regions, William H. Frey writes. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/immigration-drives-the-nations-healthy-post-pandemic-population-growth-new-census-data-show/
How much immigration will we need going forward? Recent projections from William H. Frey show that only with high immigration (about 1.5 million people a year) will the population continue to grow through the rest of the century. Read more: https://www.brookings.edu/articles/immigration-drives-the-nations-healthy-post-pandemic-population-growth-new-census-data-show/
Recent projections by William H. Frey and new @uscensusbureau analyses together make the case that immigration will be an important ingredient for our future national and economic survival. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/immigration-drives-the-nations-healthy-post-pandemic-population-growth-new-census-data-show/
Immigration continues to invoke heated debates, particularly in light of the incoming Trump administration’s proposed policies regarding immigration control and deportations, which could sharply reduce immigrant gains for the U.S. population. But net immigration from abroad —not a return to pre-pandemic birth and death levels— is mostly responsible for the nation’s population growth from July 2023 to July 2024—the largest in over two decades.
In his new analysis of the U.S. Census Bureau’s annual end-of-year release on state and national growth, @ Brookings Institution demographer William H. Frey finds that this notable rise in the nation’s growth impacted all regions and most states in 2023-24. The South leads other regions in population growth, though not all of the top population-gaining states are located there. California, New York, and New Jersey rank third, fifth, and sixth, respectively, in 2023-24 numeric gains.
These immigration gains are especially important because it is unlikely that the nation’s levels of natural population increase (the excess of births over deaths) will rise substantially in the future due to aging—making immigration a key component of future U.S. demographic growth.
In fact, recent projections from Frey show that only with high immigration (about 1.5 million people a year) will the U.S. population continue to grow through the rest of the century. These projections and the new U.S. Census Bureau analyses together make the case that immigration will be an important ingredient for our future national and economic survival.
Read more: https://www.brookings.edu/articles/immigration-drives-the-nations-healthy-post-pandemic-population-growth-new-census-data-show/